Legal Opinion
Springer v. Singleton
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 21, 1967No. Civ. 23768PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.
Appellant Springer brought this action against respondent Singleton seeking damages on the ground that Singleton had induced Jerome Siemsen, George Siemsen and Jean Taylor (Siemsen) Rich to breach their contract to sell certain real property to him. The trial court entered judgment in favor of respondent Singleton, and Springer appeals.
There is little dispute as to the facts. The Siemsens owned a tract of land in Lake County known as the ‘1 Slaughter House Property.” Springer, a real estate broker, knew the property was for sale, and had shown it to prospective buyers on several occasions.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Dryden v. Tri-Valley GrowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Gold v. Los Angeles Democratic LeagueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Ramona Manor Convalescent Hospital v. Care EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Charles C. Chapman Building Co. v. California MartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.