Legal Opinion

Matlack v. Arend

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 4, 1949PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The remedy sought to be achieved by the plaintiff in this action is a final judgment requiring the defendants or those of them having reversionary estates therein to convey to him certain lands and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Mantell v. International Plastic Harmonica Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
  2. N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Detwiler v. CaponeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Martindell v. Fiduciary Counsel, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
  5. Bateman v. RileyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Flack v. LasterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Botticello v. StefanoviczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Estate of Griffin v. SumnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Shull v. SextonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  5. Wittner v. MetzgerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API