Legal Opinion

Vassar Holding Co. v. Wuensch

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 5, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of "all those lots, tracts or parcels of land and premises known as 32-34-36-38 Austin street, Newark, New Jersey, and 19 Tichenor street, Newark, New Jersey, together with the factory and two dwellings thereon."

It is admitted that the entire front of the building on Austin street, approximately fifty feet in width, encroaches on land of the city of Newark from one to one and a half inches.

It was also proved that defendants purchased the land for the purpose of selling at a profit; that they did contract to sell to South…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bateman v. RileyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
  2. Doutney v. LambieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  3. Franklin v. WeltNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marchant v. McDonaldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  2. La Salle v. La PointeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  3. Burns Trading Corp. v. Blue Front MarketNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Minez v. Kromocolor, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
  5. Gravino v. GraliaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API