Legal Opinion

Kuppenheimer v. Wertheimer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1895PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error toi Wayne; Frazer, J. Assumpsit by Bernhard Kuppenheimer and others against William Wertheimer and Max Wertheimer for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiffs, who are wholesale dealers in clothing at Chicago, 111., recovered judgment against defendants, retail dealers at Detroit, Mich., for the value of a bill of clothing shipped to them upon their order. The order was given by defendant Max Wertheimer at plaintiffs’ store, the goods being ordered from samples shown him. The defendant testified that the goods were to be shipped the same day by express, to Detroit, where-he was to have the privilege of examining them, and, if found to bo like the samples, they were to be paid for. The plaintiffs offered testimony tending to show that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lingham v. EgglestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Erwin v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  3. Byles v. ColierMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Carpenter v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Wagar v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dow Chemical Co. v. Detroit Chemical WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. People ex rel. Holmes v. SheehanMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Althouse v. McMillanMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Meagher v. CowingMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Struthers-Ziegler Cooperage Co. v. Farmers Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API