Legal Opinion

Byles v. Colier

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1884PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Oceana. (Russell, J.) Replevin. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.

Replevin for a quantity of lumber. The plaintiff claimed title to the lumber under a contract made between S. B. Earnsworth, Charles Farnsworth, Addie P. Farnsworth, William Farnsworth and Fanny Whittington, of the first part, and A. W. Byrne, of the second part, dated October 28, 1880, whereby the parties of the first part agreed *2to cut, haul and saw in their mill at Mears, the timber on certain lands owned by them in Oceana county, and sell the lumber to the party of the second part at certain rates specified for eight separate classes, ranging from four dollars per thousand feet for culls,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Hatch v. Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Oil Co. v. Van EttenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. The Elgee Cotton CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Southwestern Freight & Cotton Press Co. v. StanardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  5. Lingham v. EgglestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Conrad v. FisherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Germain v. LoudMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Idaho Implement Co. v. LambachIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Elliott v. PopeIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Kuppenheimer v. WertheimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API