Althouse v. McMillan
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw; Snow, J. Replevin by Clarence W. Althouse against John G. McMillan and Charles E. Eord. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
Plaintiff brought this action of replevin to recover a car load of heading which defendants had seized under a writ of attachment against one M. S. Daniels. The heading, when attached, was in transit from Clare, Mich., to Liverpool, England, in pursuance of a contract of sale between said plaintiff and said Daniels. The only question in this case is whether, under said contract, the title to said heading had or had not passed to Daniels.
The contract was made by correspondence. Plaintiff agreed to sell and Daniels agreed to buy the heading at “$6.35 per 100 sets, delivered, less New York rates…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lingham v. EgglestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Dodge v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Christopher v. HechheimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Kuppenheimer v. WertheimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Western Union Railroad v. WagnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Detroit Chemical WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Detroit Southern Railroad v. MalcomsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. SlateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Van Buren Light & Power Co. v. Inhabitants of Van BurenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1920
- Meagher v. CowingMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.