Wagar v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ionia. (Smith, J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
In this case the facts are found and rest chiefly on documents. The only question in the case which is of any special importance is whether a sale of lumber made by W. F. & G. W. Turner to John J. Foster & Co. passed title to 100,000 feet of mill culls replevied in this suit.
On August 17, 1887, W. F. & G. W. Turner owned 125,000 feet of pine mill culls, piled up at Dixon’s siding, in piles marked “Mill Culls,” but containing more or less other lumber. On that day the Turners sold to Foster & Oo. by absolute bill of sale, and for payment made at the time, 100,000 feet of mill culls, at $5.50,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lingham v. EgglestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Tuttle v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Carpenter v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Larkin v. Mitchell & Rowland Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Iron Cliffs Co. v. BuhlMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Detroit Chemical WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Department of Conservation v. ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Kuppenheimer v. WertheimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- H. M. Tyler Lumber Co. v. CharltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Blydenstein v. New York Security & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.