Erwin v. Harris
Supreme Court of Georgia
Statute of frauds. Contracts. Sales. Delivery. Measure of damages. Before W. D. Nottingham, judge pro hac vice. City court of Macon. June term, 1890. Deported in tbe decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Simmons, Justice.
1. Erwin, the plaintiff in error, pleaded, among other things, tbe statute of frauds. One of his assignments of error in the motion for a new trial was, that the verdict was in favor of Harris and contrary to the charge of the court, the court having charged in substance that if the buyer bought of the defendants the five car-loads of oats “f. o. b.” at twenty-one cents, the contract would be void under the statute of frauds if the oats were worth more than $50 and the contract was not in writing, and if the buyer had accepted none of the goods nor given anything in earnest…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dows v. National Exchange Bank of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Farmers and Mechanics' Nat. Bank v. . LoganNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- The Bank of Rochester v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Merchants' National Bank of Cincinnati v. BangsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- First National Bank of Green Bay v. DearbornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Capital City Brick Co. v. Atlanta Ice & Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Portland Flouring Mills Co. v. British & Foreign Marine Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Detroit Chemical WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Greenwood Grocery Co. v. Canadian County Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
- Southern Railway Co. v. StrozierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.