Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Hughes

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1939No. Civil No. 4110PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Fred Perkins, hereinafter called plaintiff, filed his complaint in the nature of quo warranto against Coit I. Hughes, hereinafter called defendant, exercising the functions, franchise and powers of the office of Superintendent of Public Health of the state of Arizona. The complaint alleged, in substance, that defendant was on the 10th day of May, 1937, appointed Superintendent of Public Health of the state of Arizona for the period beginning May 10, 1937, and expiring the first Tuesday in April, 1939, by the Honorable it. C. Stanford, who was at that time the duly elected, qualified and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Coggins v. ElyArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Automatic Registering MacHine Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State Tax Commission v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State ex inf. Major ex rel. Sikes v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  5. Bank of Lowell v. CoxArizona Supreme Court · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Adams v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Ernst v. CollinsArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Denish v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Graham v. LockhartArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  5. McBride v. OsbornArizona Supreme Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API