Legal Opinion
Denish v. Johnson
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 29, 1996No. 23182PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANCHINI, Justice.(1)Diane D. Denish and J. Michael Kelly applied to this Court with an Emergency Verified Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Request for Immediate Stay, to prevent Governor Gary E. Johnson from removing them from their positions as regents of New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology and appointing their replacements. We granted the Stay and issued an Alternative Writ of Mandamus ordering the parties to brief whether the terms of Denish and Kelly have expired. We conclude that their term's have expired and that the Governor may nominate their successors in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kaluczky v. City of White PlainsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- University of Rhode Island v. A.W. Chesterton CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Asplund v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
- Magnolia Bar Association, Inc. v. Roy Noble LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Katz v. New Mexico Department of Human ServicesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- STATE JUDICIAL STANDARDS COM'N v. EspinosaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- State ex rel. New Mexico Judicial Standards Commission v. EspinosaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- Governor v. Nevada State LegislatureNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- Block v. Vigil-GironNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- American Federation of State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.