Legal Opinion

Graham v. Lockhart

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1939No. Civil No. 4111PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoss, C. J.

This is an action in the nature of a quo warranto commenced by Mortie A. Graham against Lynn Lockhart to try the right to the office of member of the Industrial Commission. Tbe facts are fully set forth in the pleadings and are as follows: One J. Ney Miles, prior to January 8, 1938, was a duly appointed and acting member of the Industrial Commission. On that day his term of office expired and the Governor of the state “attempted,” as alleged in the complaint,

“to appoint the plaintiff ... to succeed said J. Ney Miles, but the Senate . . . was not then in session to act upon or confirm said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCall v. CullArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Opinion of the Justices to the Governor & CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  3. Sweeney v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Perkins v. HughesArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Cragin v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Jones v. LockhartArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Jennings v. WoodsArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. HagemeisterNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. McBride v. OsbornArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  5. People Ex Rel. Warren v. ChristianWyoming Supreme Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API