Legal Opinion

State Tax Commission v. Shattuck

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1934No. Civil 3449; Civil 3448PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

The purpose of these two suits is the same, and for that reason they have been presented, argued, and submitted together. They seek to enjoin the state tax commission from assessing and taxing the plaintiffs’ intangible property under the provisions of “the Intangible Property Tax Act of 1933” (Laws 1933 [1st Sp. Sess.], chap. 16), the said commission being the body named to administer the act, for the reason, as they assert, that the said act in many of its provisions violates the state and federal Constitutions, and is so uncertain, unintelligible and indefinite as to be incapable of…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Londoner v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Wilderness World, Inc. v. Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Roberts v. SprayArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Iman v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Iman v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1965

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API