Meyer v. City and County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Franklin K. Lane, City Attorney, Percy V. Long, City Attorney, D. Freidenrich, and Naphtaly, Freidenrich & Ackerman, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an action to recover of the defendant the amount due upon thirteen Dupont-Street bonds, issued by the defendant and held by the plaintiff. A general demurrer to the complaint was overruled by the court below, the defendant answered, and thereupon, upon motion of plaintiff, judgment was entered for the plaintiff upon the pleadings, from which the defendant appeals.
The complaint alleges the execution of the bonds, sets forth one of them verbatim, states that the others are of the same tenor and effect, differing only in the number, avers that the plaintiff is the holder of the bonds,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Davenport v. County of DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Labette County Commissioners v. United States Ex Rel. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Harshman v. Knox CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Oroville & Va. R.R. v. Supervisors of Plumas Cty.California Supreme Court · 1869
- People v. RomeroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- County of San Diego v. HammondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Brookes v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- City of Globe v. WillisArizona Supreme Court · 1915
- Irvine v. BossenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McGilvery v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.