Legal Opinion
Heath v. Green City Irrigation District
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 20, 1932No. 12,839PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell
The aim of this proceeding is the dissolution of defendant in error, the Green City Irrigation District, located in Weld county, Colorado. It was organized as a district in 1909, by conforming to the requirements of chapter' 113 of the Laws of 1905. Section 48 of that chapter relates to the dissolution of irrigation districts organized thereunder.- Among other things this chapter prescribes that the petition for such dissolution shall recite “that all bills and claims of every nature whatsoever have been fully satisfied and paid.” If the directors of the district are so satisfied, and if they…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Interstate Trust Co. v. Montezuma Valley Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- Meyer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Hewel v. HoginCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Anderson v. Grand Valley Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Davis v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Moody v. Provident Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Denver-Greeley Valley Irr. Dist. v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Miners & Merchants Bank v. HerronArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- State Ex Rel. Shaw v. Police Jury of Catahoula ParishLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
- Denver-Greeley Valley Irr. Dist. v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.