Irvine v. Reclamation District No. 108
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
These consolidated actions present the question of the liability of reclamation- districts for interest on their bonds and interest coupons after maturity. The Irvine ease was before this court on a prior occasion but the issue was not passed upon. (Irvine v. Gibson, 19 Cal.2d 14 [118 P.2d 812].)
In the Irvine case it is charged in the complaint that the defendant Reclamation District No. 108, was organized under the general reclamation law of 1868; and issued on January 1, 1925, bonds of the denomination of $1,000 each in the total principal sum of $3,142,000, bearing interest at 6 per cent…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Los Angeles Dredging Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Gray v. BekinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Meyer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Spencer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Savings & Loan Society v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rand v. BossenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Irvine v. BossenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Gregory v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Mueller v. ToddMontana Supreme Court · 1945
- McGuire & Hester v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.