Hudnutt v. Comstock
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Mecosta. (Fuller, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
In the view we take of this case, the question whether there was a contract of warranty as alleged by the appellant, and defendant, is important in relation to the principal errors assigned.
The pleadings in the case are a declaration in assumpsit on the common counts, a plea of the general issue, and a notice that the work, labor and material furnished were done and furnished by plaintiff in manufacturing and putting into the saw-mill of defendant certain machinery, among which was a sawdust elevator, which the plaintiff agreed to and with the defendant should be a good piece of machinery and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Raynor v. NortonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Cameron v. BlackmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Fish v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by4 opinions
- De Palma v. WeinmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1909
- Piowaty v. SheldonMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Smith v. PickandsMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Richmond v. AtkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1885