Legal Opinion
Piowaty v. Sheldon
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 2, 1911No. Docket No. 48PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error to Sanilac; Beach, J. Assumpsit by Max Piowaty against Watson H. Sheldon for breach of contract. Defendant gave notice of recoupment. Judgment for defendant of $2,961.20. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The plaintiff, a jobber of fruits and vegetables, residing in the city of Chicago, brought this suit against the defendant, a buyer and jobber of produce, residing at Lexington, in the county of Sanilac, in this State, to recover damages for the alleged breach of and a claimed penalty withheld by the defendant, under a contract in the words and figures following:
“Lexington, Sept. 13, 1907.
“W. Sheldon, of Lexington, Michigan, sold to M. Piowaty, of Chicago, 111., the whole output of all winter and fall apples for this season.
“The No. 1 apples should be packed free from worms and smooth stock,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hill v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Lewis v. . GreiderNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Smith v. . PetteeNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Williams v. RobbMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Van Den Bosch v. BouwmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Derrick v. BlazersMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Taylor v. GoldsmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- McFadden v. ShanleyArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Falmouth Co-Operative Marketing Ass'n v. Pennsylvania RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Pandaleon v. BreckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1924