Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Blackman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Bay. Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Blackman and Eddy recovered judgment against John C. and Henry A. Cameron, as partners, upon an account of several items, the only ones appearing, as this record is made up, to be open to dispute being clothing and other articles furnished to Ered Cameron, a young man who was a relative of the partners, and who was once in their employ.

In proving the account, Blackman, who was a witness, was allowed to refresh his memory by referring to a memorandum, which, although taken from his books, was not copied from his own entries. He swore, however, that he had a complete recollection of the facts,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hudnutt v. ComstockMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Smith v. PickandsMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Richmond v. AtkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API