Legal Opinion

Richmond v. Atkinson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the Superior Court, of Detroit. (Ckipman, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, C. J.

Plaintiffs brought suit against defendant, declaring on the common counts and filing a bill of particulars charging defendant with various materials and labor of men in enlarging and repairing a house. Defendant pleadpd the general issue with notice that under such issue he would prove that the workmanship was poor and the materials used of an inferior quality, and claiming damages in recoupment.

One of the plaintiffs (Richmond) testified that ho kept the books of the plaintiffs, and put upon them such items of labor and materials as were reported to him by his men; that personally he knew…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hudnutt v. ComstockMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Cameron v. BlackmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carreras v. Honeggers & Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Finch v. W. R. Roach Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Eberson v. Continental Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API