Legal Opinion

Smith v. Pickands

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1907No. Docket No. 126PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Cheboygan; Shepherd, J. •Assumpsit by Egbert J. Smith against Marion R. Pickands for goods sold and delivered. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

This suit was instituted in justice’s court. There plaintiff recovered. It was appealed to the circuit court, and tried by jury, and there, too, plaintiff recovered. The dispute in this court relates only to certain items in plaintiff’s account, viz., the number and price of certain trees sold and delivered to defendant, and an item of $10 paid for installing a telephone.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in permitting plaintiff, in testifying to the number of trees and the prices charged therefor, to refresh his memory by looking at a copy which he himself had made from a book of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stahelin v. SowleMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Simons v. Ypsilanti Paper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Hudnutt v. ComstockMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. McCall Co. v. JacobsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Cameron v. BlackmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Denny-Renton Clay & Coal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Piowaty v. SheldonMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Muncie Wheel & Jobbing Co. v. FinchMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Paine v. ParkhurstCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API