Legal Opinion
Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 12, 1966No. 40PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
385 U.S. 276 (1966)
WOODBY
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE.
No. 40.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued November 17, 1966.
Decided December 12, 1966.[*]
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
Jacob A. Myers argued the cause for petitioner in No. 40. With him on the briefs was Sidney G. Kusworm, Sr.
Francis X. Beytagh, Jr., argued the cause for respondent in No. 40, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court. On the brief were Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Robert S. Rifkind, L. Paul Winings and Charles Gordon.
Joseph Forer argued…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Stewart.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mondaca-Vega v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Mondaca-Vega v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Mondaca-Vega v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015