Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mondaca-Vega v. Holder

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 15, 2015No. 03-71369Published

1Dissent

N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge,

dissenting in part, with whom THOMAS, Chief Judge, and PREGERSON and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, join in Part I, but concurring in Sections I — III and in the result of Section V and VI of the majority decision:

United States citizenship is “a right no less precious than life or liberty.” United States v. Dang, 488 F.3d 1135, 1138 (9th Cir.2007) (quoting Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 616, 69 S.Ct. 384, 93 L.Ed. 266 (1949) (Rutledge, J., concurring)). The Supreme Court has noted, “It is better that many ... immigrants should be improperly admitted than that…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API