Legal Opinion
Mondaca-Vega v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 15, 2015No. 03-71369PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The petition for review is denied.
Judge Hurwitz wrote an opinion joined by the full panel as to Parts I — III; by Judges Kozinski, Silverman, Rawlinson, Bybee, Murguia and Nguyen as to Part IV; and by Judges Kozinski, Silverman, Rawlinson and Bybee as to Parts V and VI.
Judge N.R. Smith wrote an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, which Chief Judge Thomas, and Judges Pregerson and W. Fletcher join as to Part I. Judge N.R. Smith concurs in the result of (but does not join) Parts V and VI of Judge Hurwitz’s opinion.
Judge Murguia wrote an opinion concurring in part and…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Baumgartner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Ricky Earp v. Ron DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. David LonichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Mark Brown v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Smith v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Michael Rose v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.