Legal Opinion
Sonterra Capital Master Fund v. Barclays Bank Plc
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided December 21, 2018No. 15-CV-3538 (VSB)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an alleged price-fixing conspiracy, each overt act that is part of the violation and that injures the plaintiff starts the statutory period running again, regardless of the plaintiff's knowledge of the alleged illegality at much earlier times. Plaintiffs may only recover damages based on acts falling within the statutory period, and not based on previous acts.
Merced Irrigation Dist. v. Barclays Bank PLC , 165 F.Supp.3d 122, 134-35 (S.D.N. Y, 2016) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); see also Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. , 401 U.S. 321, 338, 91 S.Ct. 795, 28…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Doe v. Trump Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Actava TV, Inc. v. Joint Stock Company "Channel One Russia Worldwide"District Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- B & R Supermarket, Inc. v. Visa, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- BMA LLC v. HDR Global Trading LimitedDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Catherine McKoy, Marcus Frazier and Lynn Chadwick v. The Trump Corporation and Donald J. TrumpDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.