Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. Hollerich

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 28, 1986No. C4-86-1049PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

This is an appeal from summary judgment of a personal injury suit on the issue of negligence. The trial court granted respondents’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed appellant’s claim with prejudice on the basis that respondents breached no duty to appellant.

FACTS

The facts in this case are undisputed. Respondents Margaret and Harley Gron-seth are next door neighbors, and share a common border with respondent Donald Hollerich. Both backyard lawns slope downhill to the east into a wooded area containing a pond. In 1981 or 1982, Holle-rich, with assistance from Mr.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Peterson v. WT Rawleigh CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Munoz v. Applebaum's Food Market, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. William H. Sowles v. Urschel Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  5. Friday v. City of MoorheadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Louis v. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  2. Baber v. DillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Snilsberg v. Lake Washington ClubCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Harmon Contract Glazing, Inc. v. Libby-Owens-Ford Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Jones v. Kartar Plaza Ltd.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API