Legal Opinion
Baber v. Dill
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 19, 1995No. C1-93-1075PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.
On July 16,1989, while working on property owned by Mike Dill, William Baber slipped, fell, and was impaled on a steel reinforcing rod. William Baber and his wife, Mary Lou Baber brought this lawsuit against Mike Dill alleging negligence and damages resulting from personal injuries that William Baber sustained. At the close of the Babers’ case in chief, the trial court directed a verdict in favor of Dill, principally on the conclusion that William Baber’s actions constituted primary assumption of the risk. Further, the trial court also determined Dill did not owe…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kolatz v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Peterson v. WT Rawleigh CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Nemanic v. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Bisher v. Homart Development Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Munoz v. Applebaum's Food Market, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Louis v. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Olmanson v. LeSueur CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Sutherland v. BartonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Wall v. Fairview Hospital & Healthcare ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Foss v. KincadeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.