Legal Opinion

Louis v. Louis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 6, 2001No. C3-00-1325PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILBERT, Justice.

This case involves a landowner’s contention that there is no duty of care owed to someone invited onto his land unless a special relationship exists between the landowner and the entrant. The district court ruled in favor of appellant, Robert Louis, on his motion for summary judgment and the court of appeals reversed and remanded. We affirm, although we do so on different grounds than those cited by the court of appeals.

The facts relevant to this appeal are undisputed. In the spring of 1995, appellant, Robert Louis, purchased a used aboveground swimming pool. He also…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Peterson v. BalachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Lubbers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Conover v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Larson v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Delgado v. LohmarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Domagala v. RollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  3. Geoffrey Varga v. U.S. Bank National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  4. Olmanson v. LeSueur CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. Foss v. KincadeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API