Legal Opinion
Harmon Contract Glazing, Inc. v. Libby-Owens-Ford Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 15, 1992No. C1-92-1115PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge.
Respondent commenced this subrogation action against appellant seeking reimbursement of workers’ compensation benefits. The jury found appellant negligent in designing the crating, bracing and shoring system used in loading and shipping glass panes to respondent and in failing to warn of the dangers in the handling process. The trial court denied appellant’s new trial motion and this appeal followed. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Appellant Libby-Owens-Ford Company (LOF) manufactures and sells commercial glass. Respondent Harmon Contract Glazing, Inc. (Harmon) purchased…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- McCormack v. Hankscraft CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Germann v. F.L. Smithe MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Balder v. HaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Strong v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Royce Young v. Pollock Engineering Group, Inc. Pollock Research and Design, Inc. Computech, a Sole Proprietorship and Lewis L. Deland, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Huggins v. Stryker Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Timothy Gamradt Carla Gamradt v. Federal Laboratories, Inc. MacE Securities International Defense Technology Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Mozes v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Block v. Toyota Motor Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.