Legal Opinion

Marks v. Kucich

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1935No. 25335. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

These two cases were consolidated in the court below for the purposes of trial. Appellants first began an action against respondents for damages for the loss of some eight hundred small chicks in the sum of, eight hundred dollars, and for the return and cancellation of a note for one hundred dollars which had been given them as part of the purchase price of the chicks. Eespondents thereupon began an action in replevin for the recovery of fifteen hundred of the chicks which had grown into pullets, alleged to remain in the possession of appellants at the time the action was begun. After some…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Larson v. Farmers Warehouse Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Seattle Seed Co. v. FujimoriWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Shell Oil Co. v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Larson v. Inland Seed CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Jolly v. C. E. Blackwell & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nakanishi v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Jones v. MallonWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Williamson v. IrwinWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Lent v. McIntoshWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Williamson v. IrwinWashington Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API