Legal Opinion

United States v. Polk

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided December 16, 1988No. ACMR 8700966PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GILLEY, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, a general court-martial consisting of commissioned officers and enlisted members found the appellant guilty of rape, assault consummated by battery,1 kidnapping, and breaking restriction in violation of Articles 120, 128, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 928, and 934 (1982), respectively. The court-martial sentenced him to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for twenty years, total forfeiture of pay and allowances, and reduction to the grade of Private El. The convening authority approved…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  4. United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. PolkUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. HawkinsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  3. United States v. DorseyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. StarksU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  5. United States v. CalderonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API