United States v. Polk
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
COX, Judge:
Appellant was convicted by general court-martial of kidnapping and rape, in violation of Articles 134 and 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 934 and 920, respectively. He appeals his con*151viction on two grounds. First, he contends that the evidence to convict him is not sufficient as a matter of law. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); United States v. Odegard, 25 M.J. 140 (CMA 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061, 108 S.Ct. 1017, 98 L.Ed.2d 982 (1988). Second, he contends that he was denied effective assistance of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. DiCupeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by175 opinions
- United States v. GilleyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
- United States v. GoochCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
- United States v. TippitCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
- United States v. McConnellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
- United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
170 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.