Legal Opinion

United States v. Starks

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 31, 1993No. ACMR 9102190PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

DELL’ORTO, Judge:

Pursuant to mixed pleas, the appellant was found guilty, at a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members, of larceny (two specifications), forgery (two specifications), and making and uttering checks without sufficient funds, in violation of Articles 123, 123a, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 923, 923a, and 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The appellant was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for two years, and reduction to Private El. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence.

The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  4. United States v. PaleniusUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  5. United States v. PolkUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. CoburnNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  2. United States v. PlottU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. Private E1 MICHAEL A. NICKSArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
  4. United States v. Private E1 RONALD B. SMITH, JR.Army Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
  5. United States v. Private E1 TREVOR R. FORDYCEArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API