United States v. Calderon
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT UPON FURTHER REVIEW
JAMES, Judge:
This case presents the question of the effectiveness of the assistance of defense counsel in post-trial activities before the convening authority’s action. Appellant pleaded guilty to and was convicted of distributions and uses of cocaine. He was sentenced to be discharged from the service with a bad-conduct discharge, to be confined for 18 months, to forfeit all pay and allowances, and to be reduced to E-l. Appellant and his counsel submitted no matters to the convening authority after trial, and the convening authority approved that…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. HawkinsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. RobertsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. BryantU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003