Legal Opinion

Miller v. Talton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1993No. 9211SC611PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Plaintiffs’ single assignment of error is directed to the entry of summary judgment dismissing their complaint. They argue first that the affirmative defense of the statute of limitations, having never been properly pleaded, was not before the trial court and could not, therefore, provide a basis for summary judgment. Secondly, they argue that even if defendants had properly asserted the statute of limitations as a defense, genuine issues of fact exist as to whether defendants are precluded by the doctrine of equitable estoppel from relying on the defense. We reject plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Snyder v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Ballenger v. CrowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Friedland v. GalesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. GoelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Harter v. VernonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Robinson v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Webster Enterprises, Inc. v. Selective InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API