Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Williams

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1991No. 9021SC393PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Although plaintiff brings forth a number of assignments of error, the crux of this appeal is whether plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to withstand defendants’ motion for directed verdict on three grounds. The first is whether plaintiff presented evidence sufficient to show Williams breached the applicable standard of care when she advised Ferguson that Percodan and Indocin were unrelated. Second is whether plaintiff provided sufficient evidence to show Ferguson’s ingestion of Indocin caused his death; and third, whether decedent was contributorily negligent in not telling…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. ZunigaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Taylor v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Batiste v. American Home Products Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cottam v. CVS PharmacyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. Memorial Hosp. of GulfportMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Walls v. Alpharma USPD, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. Rite Aid Corp. v. Levy-GrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Cox v. SteffesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API