Legal Opinion

Smith v. Garis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 22, 1927No. 17435PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASON. V. C. J.

The plaintiff in error was the defendant' below, and the defendant in error was the plaintiff. For convenience, they will be referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff, who was an attorney at law, commenced this action againgt the defendant in the justice court, at Enid, to recover on three causes of action. The first cause of action was to recover $60 as an attorney fee for representing the defendant in an action in the district court of Alfalfa county, which was later appealed to the Supreme Court. The second cause of .action was to recover an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vickers v. Philip Carey Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Herring v. HoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Bryan v. RamseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Straughan v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Wiers v. TreeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American Oil & Refining Co. v. KincannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Webster v. EkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Reviere v. PayneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Carter v. Bond & BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp. v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API