Legal Opinion
Wiers v. Treese
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 10, 1911No. 726PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Error from District Court. Pawnee Countyj L. M. Poe, Judge. Action by S. N. Treese against M. A. Wiers and W. A. Moore. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, C. J.
This case presents error from the district court of Pawnee county, being an appeal to that court from a judgment of a justice of the peace, rendered prior to statehood. Action was brought by S. N. Treese, as plaintiff, to recover against M. A. Wiers and W. A. Moore, defendants, on the following promissory note:
“$40.00. Cleveland, O. T., Sept. 6th, 1901.
“January 1st, 1904, after date, the Greenwood Gin Co. promise to pay to S. N. Treese & Son or bearer, forty dollars at the Triangle Bank of Cleveland, O. T., value received with interest at 10 per cent, per annum.'
“No. 3. Due Jan. 1st, 1901.
“…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mechanics' Bank v. Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- Metcalf v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Dunham v. Cincinnati, P., & CR Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Brockway v. AllenNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Falk v. MoebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Eskridge v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Straughan v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. HurleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Butterick Co. v. MolenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Denman v. BrennamenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.