Legal Opinion

Washington National Insurance v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 2, 1933No. Docket No. 1415PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an original proceeding instituted here to compel, by writ of mandate, the respondent court and judge to vacate an order dismissing an appeal from the Justice’s Court of Riverside Township, and permitting petitioner to either amend its undertaking on appeal or file another undertaking.

Riverside Township has a population in excess of thirty thousand. Petitioner brought suit in the Justice’s Court of Riverside Township against Guy E. Farmer. Judgment was rendered for defendant and petitioner appealed to the Superior Court of Riverside County. The record was prepared and transmitted to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Golden Gate Tile Co. v. Superior Court, in & for City of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Peacock v. Superior Court in and for SolanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Cohen v. ConnickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  4. Jarman v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Pacific States Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API