Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 2, 1935No. Civ. 5300PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

Petitioner seeks by this writ of mandate to compel respondents to hear and determine an order to show cause why one named therein should not be punished for contempt.

It is alleged in the petition that Clyde Thomas and Suzette Thomas were husband and wife-; that an action for divorce was filed and defendant therein, Clyde Thomas, failing to appear, his default was duly entered and an interlocutory decree of divorce obtained. In this decree it was ordered “that defendant pay to plaintiff the sum of fifty ($50.00) dollars per month as alimony for the support and maintenance of said plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Brock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Hayward v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Short v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Washington National Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. State v. LinnAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Friedland v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. MacPherson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Texas Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API