Peacock v. Superior Court in and for Solano
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of. Mandate directed to the Superior Court in and for the County of Solano. A. J. Buckles, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
An action in a justice’s court was brought and prosecuted by W. S. Peacock, petitioner herein, against Henry Goosen, defendant. Trial was had, oral and documentary evidence was introduced on behalf of the plaintiff, and when plaintiff rested his case the defense moved for a nonsuit upon the ground of his failure to prove the material allegations of his complaint. The justice granted the motion and dismissed the action. Peacock prosecuted in due form his appeal to the superior court from, the judgment so rendered, his notice of appeal declaring that the appeal was taken on questions of both…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Golden Gate Tile Co. v. Superior Court, in & for City of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Maxson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Myrick v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Edwards v. Superior Court, in & for the Cty. of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
3Cited by11 opinions
- Superior Wheeler Cake Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Fowler v. GillmanUtah Supreme Court · 1930
- Himovitz v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Butler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Corrigan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.