Legal Opinion

Golden Gate Tile Co. v. Superior Court, in & for City of S.F.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1911No. S.F. No. 5509PublishedCited by 48 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandamus to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Thos. F. Graham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Petitioner asked for a writ of review directed to the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, and Hon. Thomas F. Graham, one of the judges thereof. Upon reading and considering said petition, this court, being of the opinion that the appropriate remedy under the facts stated was an alternative writ of mandate, such writ was accordingly issued.

There is no controversy respecting the facts alleged in the petition, which, briefly stated, are as follows: On October 27, 1909, judgment was entered for the plaintiff in the justices’ court of the city and county of San Francisco in the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Schwarz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People ex rel. Whitney v. Board of Delegates of San Francisco Fire DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Stumpf v. Board of Supervisors of San Luis Obispo CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Ex Parte BradstreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  5. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Matter of FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Robinson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Superior Wheeler Cake Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API