Haddock v. Sticelber Mong
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Rogers County ; W. J. Campbell, Judge. Action -by Sticelber & Mong against John Haddock. .Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUMMONS, C.
This ' action was commenced in the district court of Rogers county by the defendants in error, hereinafter called plaintiffs, against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, to recover the sum of $1,118 for work* and ma-' terial furnished in drilling an oil and gas well and to foreclose a lien upon certain real estate in Rogers county to satisfy said debt. The defendant answered, admitting that the plaintiffs entered" into parol contract with the defendant and the Westerly Oil Company and P. P. Daulgren to drill a well upon -the premises described in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Moore v. First Nat. Bank of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
3Cited by11 opinions
- Logan County v. YorkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. BallardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Clevenger v. Crosby & MooneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Great Lakes Pipe Line Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Roberts v. Southwestern Surety Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.