Legal Opinion

Bedford v. Tetzlaff

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1953No. Docket 36, Calendar 45,886PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Arline Bedford, plaintiff and appellee, seeks to foreclose a land contract in chancery. In her bill of complaint she alleges a default by defendants and declares the full amount of principal and interest due in accord with an acceleration clause in the contract.

The decree of the lower court ordered the defendants to pay to plaintiff the entire principal due under the contract, together with accrued interest and unpaid taxes and insurance. In the event of nonpayment, the decree provided that the premises should be sold and the proceeds of sale applied on the amount found due. No period of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barnard v. HuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Drysdale v. P. J. Christy Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Brody v. CrozierMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Shady View Beach Land Co. v. SummersMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. A-Z Servicenter, Inc. v. SegallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  2. Dumas v. HelmMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. In Re Mill City Plastics, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1955
  4. Minchella v. FredericksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Cooper v. KlopfensteinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API