Legal Opinion

Shady View Beach Land Co. v. Summers

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1931No. Docket No. 46, Calendar No. 35,475PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiff filed bill to foreclose land contract. The bill was taken as confessed. Upon hearing, decree was entered, on October 27, 1930, requiring defendants to pay the amount due on or before December 1, 1930, and directing, if not so paid, the premises be sold. The decree affords no time or opportunity to redeem after sale, and it is this feature that defendants attack on their appeal. No point is made that defendants, with default entered and standing against them, may not appeal, and it is passed.

That some confusion in our decisions has been produced by introducing into land contract…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fitzhugh v. MaxwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Kelly v. GauklerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Cady v. TaggartMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Jones v. BowlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Drysdale v. P. J. Christy Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bedford v. TetzlaffMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Teetzel v. AtkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API