Legal Opinion

Dumas v. Helm

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1968No. Docket 4,350PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLesinski, C. J.

On March 25, 1965, defendants entered into a land contract with plaintiffs for the purchase of property in Oakland county, Michigan. The total purchase price under the contract was $5,- 500, of which $500 was paid immediately. Defendants defaulted in making certain monthly payments of principal and interest provided for in the contract.

Prior to the default which occasioned this suit, defendants fell behind often. There were several circuit court commissioners’ forfeiture actions, but defendants redeemed in each case. In addition, plaintiffs had instituted an earlier equity foreclosure action…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dionne v. Pierson Contracting Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Wood v. ButtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Youngs v. WestMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Heimerdinger v. HeimerdingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Brody v. CrozierMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Livonia Property Holdings, L.L.C. v. 12840-12976 Farmington Road Holdings, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
  2. Thompson v. Great Lakes Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (In Re Thompson)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1982
  3. Mitchell v. DahlbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Bishop v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Minchella v. FredericksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API