Legal Opinion

Drysdale v. P. J. Christy Land Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1929No. Docket No. 93, Calendar No. 34,410PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

This is an appeal from a decree for the plaintiffs providing for the foreclosure of a land contract. The decree fixed $35,863.74 as the amount due, and provided for -advertisement and sale unless paid within ten days. Payment was not made within the time specified, and the interest of the P. J. Christy Land Company was advertised and sold on March 15, 1929. The decree does not provide for any deficiency. The P. J. Christy Land Company is the only appellant. It obtained its interest as assignee of Peter J. Christy. At the time of the sale to Christy, the plaintiff’s title to the land in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. BowlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Barnard v. HuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Detroit Trust Co. v. Detroit City Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Gordon Grossman Building Co. v. ElliottMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Craig v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Bedford v. TetzlaffMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API