Legal Opinion
Mui v. Dietz
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 16, 1983No. 82 C 5993PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Plaintiff Robert Mui (“Mui”) has sued Robert H. Dietz, David Kapus, and the City of Chicago under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and several pendent state law causes of action. Jurisdiction is asserted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a). 1 Presently before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss Counts II, III, IV, V, and VI of Mui’s complaint. For reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
For purposes of a motion to dismiss, we must take the allegations in Mui’s complaint as…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Andrew Powe v. The City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Ayatollah Syed M. J. Iqbal Jafree v. John R. Barber, Acting Special Agent, Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Cohen v. Illinois Institute of TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Grant v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- DeLaCruz v. PruittDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1984
- Padilla v. D'AvisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- Cain v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Fecteau v. UNKNOWN OFFICERS & AGENTS OF CLINTON TP.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.