Legal Opinion

Grant v. City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 3, 1984No. 83 C 7757PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Plaintiffs Bonnie Lee Grant (“Grant”) and Andrea Barron (“Barron”), on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, 1 bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to challenge the constitutionality of Paragraph 27-435 of the Municipal Code of Chicago, which authorizes the immobilization of a motor vehicle when there are ten or more outstanding traffic violation notices pending against the vehicle’s owner. 2 Plaintiffs allege that this ordi nance violates the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, 3 the Fourth…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Tate v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  2. Wilson v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  3. Magnuson v. City of Hickory HillsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. SteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  5. Rackley v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API