Grant v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Plaintiffs Bonnie Lee Grant (“Grant”) and Andrea Barron (“Barron”), on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, 1 bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to challenge the constitutionality of Paragraph 27-435 of the Municipal Code of Chicago, which authorizes the immobilization of a motor vehicle when there are ten or more outstanding traffic violation notices pending against the vehicle’s owner. 2 Plaintiffs allege that this ordi nance violates the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, 3 the Fourth…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Tate v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Wilson v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- Magnuson v. City of Hickory HillsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. SteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Rackley v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.