Legal Opinion
Padilla v. D'Avis
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 1, 1984No. 83 C 6390, 82 C 2943PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Gloria Padilla (“Padilla”) and Anita Jones (“Jones”) have separately sued Dr. Luis M. d’Avis and the City of Chicago (“City”) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) for damages arising from Dr. d’Avis’ alleged sexual assaults during the course of his gynecological examinations of Padilla and Jones at a City Department of Health facility. Each plaintiff’s Complaint also asserts pendent state law tort claims against both Dr. d’Avis and City.
Jones is before this Court on a motion to reconsider Judge Perry’s previous dismissal of her case. 1 In…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- West Virginia Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority v. A.B.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
- Anita Jones v. City of Chicago, Gloria Padilla v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Webb v. Jewel Companies, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Medina v. City of OsawatomieDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Hunter v. Countryside Ass'n for the Handicapped, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.