Legal Opinion

Nicols v. Board of Police Pension Fund Commissioners

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 29, 1905No. 9PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, P. J.

Mandate.

The petitioner alleges that Watson Nicols, now deceased, was appointed ,a police officer and member of the police department of the city and county of San Francisco June 9, 1871, and from that time continuously and duly served as a regular officer in active service in said department until he was retired from active service as hereinafter stated, and was a member of the said police department continuously from the time of said retirement until his death; that in Sep tember, 1889, while serving as a policeman in said city and county, he became physically disabled while in, and in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pennie v. ReisSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Kauz v. Great Council of the Improved Order of Red MenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1883

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dryden v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. City of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Shealor v. City of LodiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Gaffney v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. Barney v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API